eagle crest logo   February 3, 2020 The Honorable Chris Holden and Laura Friedman Assembly Utilities and Energy and Natural Resources Committees State Capitol Sacramento, CA 95814 Re: Opposition to Eagle Crest Legislation Dear Chair Holden and Chair Friedman, We write to express our opposition to legislation directing the procurement by the Independent System Operator of expensive long-duration bulk storage, such as the proposed Eagle Crest pumped energy storage project in the Eagle Mountains, surrounded by Joshua Tree National Park. Like in 2018 and 2019, Eagle Crest seeks the assistance of state lawmakers to evade the proper rulemaking processes conducted by state regulatory agencies that determine if, how, where and when pumped storage can help California reach its clean energy goals. Like the past two years, Eagle Crest seeks to put its thumb on the scale because the established processes that protect ratepayers and safeguard the environment have stalled its project. (1)  Said differently, a private corporation seeks to have the State legislature mandate ratepayers spend $2.5 billion to bail out its failing project that State regulators have not determined to be needed for California’s clean energy future. This is simply bad policy for California. While energy storage is crucial to California’s sustainable future, Eagle Crest has always been the wrong project in the wrong place. Unlike other proposed pumped storage projects, such as the San Vicente project in San Diego, Eagle Crest is the only project that would overdraft groundwater aquifers. The project would extract thousands of acre-feet of ice-age groundwater from an arid desert valley, then store it in uncovered reservoirs where it will rapidly evaporate, necessitating more aquifer pumping. In 2017, the National Park Service wrote, “[scientific] research suggests that the planned withdraw rate would cause damaging overdraft conditions.” In the meantime, the new reservoirs would pose the threat of acid mine drainage contaminating the aquifer, increasing raven populations to the detriment of the threatened desert tortoise, and further industrializing an area of desert bighorn sheep habitat that advocates seek to add to Joshua Tree National Park. As an economic engine, Joshua Tree brings millions of tourist dollars to desert communities each year. Further industrializing the Chuckwalla Valley would pose a severe threat to those communities’ economy. Like the proposed Cadiz groundwater mining project, Eagle Crest would overdraft groundwater aquifers that support important publicly owned lands. Like Cadiz, Eagle Crest has failed to advance its project for over two decades because its science and economics don’t add up, resulting in opposition from the environmental community and from utility associations. (2) Eagle Crest first applied for its Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) license in 1994. In the 26 years since, California lawmakers and residents have determined that our fragile desert ecosystem is a state treasure worthy of defending and protecting, and our groundwater aquifers should not be mined. We urge you to support the state’s fair rulemaking processes and oppose legislative efforts to bail out the failing Eagle Crest project. As the Los Angeles Times Editorial Board wrote last year, “Don’t pass this bill. And not just because the necessity of this particular project is in doubt, but because the potential environmental impact is far too severe to let it go through.” (3) Sincerely,
Melissa Romero
Legislative Affairs Manager
California League of Conservation Voters
Neal Desai
Senior Program Director, Pacific Region
National Parks Conservation Association
Michael Madrigal
President
Native American Land Conservancy
Kathryn Phillips
Executive Director
Sierra Club California
Kate Hoit
California Director
The Vet Voice Foundation
Jay Ziegler
Director, External Affairs & Policy
The Nature Conservancy
Bill Allayaud
Calif Director of Government Affairs
Environmental Working Group
Kelly Catlett
Associate Western States Director
Hydropower Reform Coalition
Ronald Stork
Senior Policy Staff
Friends of the River
Kim Delfino
California Program Director
Defenders of Wildlife
Matthew Baker
Policy Director
Planning and Conservation League
Chris Shutes
FERC Projects Director
California Sportfishing Protection Alliance
Nick Jensen
Conservation Biologist
California Native Plant Society
Juan Altamirano
Associate Director of Public Policy
Audubon California
Kevin Emmerich
Director
Basin and Range Watch
Erica Martinez
California Policy Advocate
Earthjustice
Geary Hund
Executive Director
Mojave Desert Land Trust
Ileene Anderson
Public Lands Deserts Director, Sr. Scientist
Center for Biological Diversity
Edward L. LaRue, Jr., M.S.;
Ecosystem Advisory Committee,
Chairperson
Desert Tortoise Council
Laura Cunningham
California Director
Western Watersheds Project
Steve Bardwell
President
Morongo Basin Conservation Association
Ryan Henson
Senior Policy Director
California Wilderness Coalition
Megan Brousseau
Associate Director
Inland Empire Waterkeeper
Phil Francis
Chair, Executive Council
Coalition to Protect America’s National Parks

1. Eagle Crest is an active participant in the California Public Utilities Commission Rulemaking Process that continues to consider pumped storage technology but has not determined if, how, when and where this technology would be needed to reach clean energy goals while protecting ratepayers from expensive, unnecessary costs. The Trump administration’s 2018 approval of Eagle Crest’s right-of-way is currently under administrative appeal. The FERC’s 2018 issuance of a new FERC license to Eagle Crest is currently being litigated in Federal court. 2. January 2, 2020 Coalition letter to the California Legislature opposing Eagle Crest legislation. 3. LA Times Editorial, May 29, 2019 “No, we shouldn’t pump desert groundwater near Joshua Tree to help store electricity“ https://www.latimes.com/opinion/editorials/la-ed-joshua-tree-eagle-mountain-pumped-storage- 20190529-story.html